Abstract
The 2022 defamation trial between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard captivated global audiences, transforming a legal proceeding into entertainment. Using framing theory and thematic analysis, this research examines the recurring themes in the New York Times articles about the 2022 Depp v. Heard defamation trial. From April 11th to June 1st, 2022, focusing on narratives created by the media. The findings manifest five recurring themes, including Johnny Depp and Amber Heard Court Appearance and Performances, Cameras in the Court Room, Judge Maintains Professionalism, and Past Proceedings and The London Trial. The findings reveal how media narratives influence public opinion, shape courtroom dynamics, and potentially reinforce stereotypes. This study contributes to understanding the media's role in crafting narratives around legal cases and its broader implications for fairness in court proceedings, especially in the digital age where public discourse is heavily influenced by viral content. Ultimately, this research highlights the need for ethical journalism in maintaining balanced and truthful reporting of high-profile trials, and how narratives can influence the public.
Advisor
Yavari, Mehri
Department
Communication Studies
Recommended Citation
Elgie, Charlotte, "When The Gavel Became a Camera: Media’s Narrative on the Defamation Trial of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard" (2025). Senior Independent Study Theses. Paper 11589.
https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy/11589
Keywords
Defamation Trial, Amber Heard, Johnny Depp, Televised Court, Framing Theory, Thematic Analysis
Publication Date
2025
Degree Granted
Bachelor of Arts
Document Type
Senior Independent Study Thesis
© Copyright 2025 Charlotte Elgie