Abstract

This study examined the relationship between the media framing of climate change and five related variables: climate change anxiety, climate change engagement, climate agency, political engagement, and political agency. Prior research is divided on how we best frame climate media to encourage political engagement and enhance self-agency in Americans. The goal of this research was to shed light on this debate while also uncovering which variables inform political decisions in a diverse sample of Americans. Political polarization and voting behavior were among the variables analyzed that have not been considered extensively in prior climate and framing research. Through analysis of framing conditions, it was hypothesized that loss-framed media would be least effective in enhancing people’s agency and encouraging political engagement. This hypothesis was tested using a sample of N = 212 American adults exposed to framed news followed by a survey to scale for variables. Significant results were not found related to framing effects. Despite this, significant results regarding political ideology and identity discrepancies were found related to all five variables. These results communicate the importance of identity and party beliefs in American politics.

Advisor

Clayton, Susan

Second Advisor

Kim, Sekwen

Department

Political Science; Psychology

Disciplines

American Politics | Psychology | Social and Behavioral Sciences

Keywords

Climate Change, Political Polarization, Loss Framing, Gain Framing

Publication Date

2025

Degree Granted

Bachelor of Arts

Document Type

Senior Independent Study Thesis

Share

COinS
 

© Copyright 2025 William Christopher