Abstract
This study explores how advancements in military space weaponry by U.S. adversaries have influenced United States national security strategies. Grounded in realism, the research hypothesizes that military developments by adversarial states lead to reactive adjustments in U.S. security strategies. The study employs a process-tracing methodological approach, focusing on Russia’s November 15, 2021 anti-satellite (ASAT) missile test as a pivotal case. By analyzing the rhetorical elements of government documents before, during, and after the event, the research identifies a clear shift in U.S. strategic posture—from general competitive rhetoric to direct condemnation and expanded military planning in space. The findings reinforce the realist view that security dilemmas extend into the space domain, where power balancing and strategic competition shape state behavior. The research underscores the growing importance of proactive space security strategies and international cooperation to prevent escalation and maintain strategic stability in an increasingly contested domain.
Advisor
Krain, Matthew
Department
Political Science
Recommended Citation
Jones, Riley Magdalene, "That’s No Moon: An Analysis of How Developments in Military Space Weaponry Influence United States’ Security Strategies" (2025). Senior Independent Study Theses. Paper 11525.
https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy/11525
Keywords
Space Weaponry, Security, Strategy, Realism Theory, ASAT, Russia, United States, Contested
Publication Date
2025
Degree Granted
Bachelor of Arts
Document Type
Senior Independent Study Thesis
© Copyright 2025 Riley Magdalene Jones