Abstract

This Independent Study examines the military recovery and political stabilization of the Roman empire from 260 to 283 AD. My project seeks to answer the following questions: How did Roman fortunes rebound so quickly during this turbulent period and what was the broader historical significance of the era, which I term the Late Crisis. To research this subject, I carefully read several ancient sources, most importantly the Historia Augusta and Zosimus’ New History, and dozens of modern publications on third-century Roman history and many related topics. The most important work for this period is David Potter’s The Roman Empire at Bay, AD 180-395. Potter contended that the third and fourth centuries can broadly be understood as a period of decline caused by poor leadership and a weakening military. I conclude that within this period, the Late Crisis represented a temporary reversal of the trend. While their economic policies were not always successful, I argue that Late Crisis emperors restored Roman dominance over neighboring territories because of an effective military doctrine pioneered by the emperor Gallienus in the 260’s and mastered in the 270’s by subsequent emperors Aurelian and Probus.

Advisor

Hettinger, Madonna

Department

Classical Studies; History; International Relations

Disciplines

Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity | Arts and Humanities | Classics | History

Publication Date

2025

Degree Granted

Bachelor of Arts

Document Type

Senior Independent Study Thesis

Share

COinS
 

© Copyright 2025 Casey Gray Hakim