Abstract
This Independent Study examines three different science fiction works, Frankenstein (1818), Rosemary’s Baby (1969), and “Bloodchild” (1984) to explore the subgenre of birth/maternity horror and its function as a commentary on women’s rights throughout the last 200 years. I use several Feminist Marxist theories and gender theories developed by critical authors such as Silvia Federici, Judith Butler, Luce Irigaray, and Hortense Spillers to analyze these fictional works’ portrayals of motherhood and highlight the value in their depictions of parturition. This paper not only focuses on examining the history of the fear of childbirth but also delves further into how these fears have been developed through societal and cultural impacts, which still extend to today. My findings emphasize society’s commodification of the womb and fertility and how these ongoing issues express themselves within the works I am examining. Overall, the purpose of this Independent Study is to shed light on the heavily ignored and silenced issue of the denial of women’s bodily autonomy during pregnancy while displaying the horror genre’s role in social change.
Advisor
Starr, Marlo
Department
English
Recommended Citation
Ponzetti, Emi, "The Breeding Industry: Reproductive Horror in Frankenstein, Rosemary's Baby, & "Bloodchild"" (2025). Senior Independent Study Theses. Paper 11285.
https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy/11285
Keywords
Horror, Pregnancy, Maternity, Frankenstein, Rosemary’s Baby, “Bloodchild”, birth, Monstrous Offspring, Feminist Marxism, Breeding Industry, Wombs, Parturition, Gender, Race, Slavery, Medical Neglect, Autonomy, Motherhood
Publication Date
2025
Degree Granted
Bachelor of Arts
Document Type
Senior Independent Study Thesis
© Copyright 2025 Emi Ponzetti